Wind enabled midges to spread Schmallenberg virus across Europe

Cattle and sheep are vulnerable to the Schmallenberg virus
Cattle and sheep are vulnerable to the Schmallenberg virus  A new study shows how midges swept along by strong winds rapidly carried the Schmallenberg virus to farms throughout Europe. 

The Schmallenberg virus, which causes severe deformities in new-born lambs and calves, was first identified in Germany in 2011. Since then, it has spread to virtually all countries in Europe and has affected over 8,000 herds, causing considerable economic loss to farmers.

The virus is transmitted by Culicoides midges, which were also responsible for the spread of bluetongue virus in 2006. The disease itself is usually relatively mild, with only adult cattle exhibiting symptoms. However, the real problem occurs when cows and ewes are infected within a critical period during pregnancy, as this results in an increased risk of birth defects and loss of the offspring.

Initially, it was unclear whether the virus was spread by imported animals or by midges. But now a paper in Scientific Reports confirms that midges blown by prevailing winds almost certainly are responsible for transmitting the disease around Europe.

The Culicoides midges are so tiny (1-3 mm) that they can easily be propelled by the wind for hundreds of kilometres. This was verified by data from a model which clearly linked the expansion of the disease with the prevailing wind direction. This also substantiates the UK Meteorological Office’s warning that the risk of Schmallenberg infection from Europe by windborne midges was greater on days when the wind was blowing from the continent. Nonetheless, the authors point out that the probability of a midge finding another host to feed upon is constrained by the strength of the winds at dusk, the time of the day when midges are normally active.

The study also revealed that the virus spreads far more widely than is suggested by the number of birth defects, as animals that are not at the critical stage of pregnancy may also carry the disease. In Belgium, a survey found that all cattle older than 6 months had already been infected by Schmallenberg by the beginning of 2012. This suggests that there are probably many other infected farms in the pathway of the disease that were never identified because they did not have susceptible pregnant animals when the midges arrived.

Diseases like Schmallenberg that are spread by insect vectors rather than direct animal-to-animal contact are particularly tricky to control. In addition, the long delay between initial infection and detection (around 113 days before foetal abnormalities become apparent) makes it difficult to determine the true extent of the disease.

Yet there is room for optimism. Most animals that have previously been exposed will naturally develop a strong protective immunity against future infections. And a vaccine has recently become available to ensure further protection, although many farmers remain undecided about this option. It is hoped that the findings in this study will also provide greater insight on how best to control any future midge-borne diseases.

Reference: Sedda L, & Rogers DJ (2013). The influence of the wind in the Schmallenberg virus outbreak in Europe. Scientific Reports, 3 PMID: 24285292

Image: O’Gorman Photography


2 thoughts on “Wind enabled midges to spread Schmallenberg virus across Europe

  1. In the article you linked I read that it’s believed this virus will “burn out” due to the excellent natural immunity it leaves behind. Is there any evidence to support that idea or will a vaccination program be necessary?

    1. That’s actually a really interesting problem. It seems that most sheep and cattle that were infected should have developed natural immunity to the disease, and obviously these won’t need to be vaccinated. But the difficulty is that we simply do not have the information on which farms were infected with the Schmallenberg virus. In the UK and Ireland it is not a notifiable disease and so farmers do not have to report infections. As the authors say themselves, better reporting could allow farmers to make more informed decisions about whether to vaccinate or not. But for those with large commercial farms, investing in vaccination appears to be worth the cost.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s